Austin Group Defect Tracker

Aardvark Mark IV


Viewing Issue Simple Details Jump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID Category Severity Type Date Submitted Last Update
0001780 [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2] Rationale Editorial Clarification Requested 2023-10-17 02:34 2023-11-14 10:39
Reporter dannyniu View Status public  
Assigned To
Priority normal Resolution Accepted As Marked  
Status Applied  
Name DannyNiu/NJF
Organization <individual>
User Reference c181.pdf
Section B.2.8 Realtime >> Message Passing
Page Number 3590
Line Number 122093-122095
Interp Status ---
Final Accepted Text Note: 0006562
Summary 0001780: The punctuation is confusing/ambiguous
Description Towards the end of the rationale for "Priotization of Messages", this is said:

> The prioritization does add additional overhead to the message operations in those cases it is actually used but a clever implementation can optimize for the FIFO case to make that more efficient

It is confusing when reading towards the middle:

"... overhead to the message operations in those cases it is actually ..."

I suspect a comma is missing between "operations" and "in those cases".
Desired Action Clarify this paragraph.
Tags applied_after_i8d3, tc3-2008
Attached Files

- Relationships

-  Notes
(0006540)
Don Cragun (manager)
2023-10-17 04:52
edited on: 2023-10-17 04:54

This has been moved from Issue 8 drafts to 1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2. The c181.pdf, page, and line numbers all refer to Issue 7 with TC2.

Note also that this text has not been changed in Issue8 draft 3.

(0006544)
gbrandenrobinson (reporter)
2023-10-17 20:37

I would suggest that a comma instead be added after "but", but agree that the sentence needs one, simply because the clauses the conjunction is coordinating are both long.
(0006545)
kre (reporter)
2023-10-17 23:11

Re Note: 0006544

If you actually intended to say "before 'but'" rather than after, I'd
agree.
(0006546)
gbrandenrobinson (reporter)
2023-10-17 23:22

I did; thanks, Robert. Nothing brings out solecisms like trying to fix solecisms.
(0006562)
geoffclare (manager)
2023-11-02 15:10

Change:
The prioritization does add additional overhead to the message operations in those cases it is actually used but a clever implementation can optimize for the FIFO case to make that more efficient.
to:
The prioritization does add additional overhead to the message operations, in those cases it is actually used, but a clever implementation can optimize for the FIFO case to make that more efficient.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2023-10-17 02:34 dannyniu New Issue
2023-10-17 02:34 dannyniu Name => DannyNiu/NJF
2023-10-17 02:34 dannyniu Organization => <individual>
2023-10-17 02:34 dannyniu User Reference => c181.pdf
2023-10-17 02:34 dannyniu Section => B.2.8 Realtime >> Message Passing
2023-10-17 02:34 dannyniu Page Number => 3590
2023-10-17 02:34 dannyniu Line Number => 122093-122095
2023-10-17 04:47 Don Cragun Project Issue 8 drafts => 1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2
2023-10-17 04:52 Don Cragun Interp Status => ---
2023-10-17 04:52 Don Cragun Note Added: 0006540
2023-10-17 04:54 Don Cragun Note Edited: 0006540
2023-10-17 20:37 gbrandenrobinson Note Added: 0006544
2023-10-17 23:11 kre Note Added: 0006545
2023-10-17 23:22 gbrandenrobinson Note Added: 0006546
2023-11-02 15:10 geoffclare Note Added: 0006562
2023-11-02 15:12 geoffclare Final Accepted Text => Note: 0006562
2023-11-02 15:12 geoffclare Status New => Resolved
2023-11-02 15:12 geoffclare Resolution Open => Accepted As Marked
2023-11-02 15:13 geoffclare Tag Attached: tc3-2008
2023-11-14 10:39 geoffclare Status Resolved => Applied
2023-11-14 10:40 geoffclare Tag Attached: applied_after_i8d3


Mantis 1.1.6[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker