View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000027Aardvark Bugspublic2009-06-17 14:02
Reportergeoffclare Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityCommentTypeError
Status ClosedResolutionAccepted As Marked 
NameGeoff Clare
OrganizationThe Open Group
User Reference
Summary0000027: what to do about "print reports"
DescriptionOn the "View Issues" page, the "Print Reports" link above the bug list loads a page which has four links for different ways of printing reports. Two of them are downloads of files in proprietary formats. I don't think it is appropriate for a defect reporting tool for an open standard to be using these proprietary formats, and I suggest those two links should be removed.

The other two links load a page in the browser. The first of these is in a tabular format that doesn't seem particularly useful, as it doesn't wrap text and so needs a lot of horizontal scrolling to view, and it just gets truncated if printed. The last link does produce something useful which could be printed. I suggest keeping just this link, but changing the button from its current form (a well-known graphical blue 'e' icon) to a suitable text button.
Desired ActionRemove the first three links and change the button for the remaining link to a text button saying "Print" or maybe "Print Preview".
TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

msbrown

2009-06-14 16:02

manager   bugnote:0000045

Removed first three options, Now only shows a link to "Formatted Long View".
It still contains the non-used fields such as "OS", which I will be fixing.

Let me know what you think in a note in this bug.

geoffclare

2009-06-15 02:16

manager   bugnote:0000047

Thanks for making the change. Looks good apart from one minor thing: I'm not sure that "Formatted Long View" fits well with the link name ("Print Reports") that takes you to that page. Maybe it would be best to change both, e.g. change "Print Reports" to something like "Printable Views" and have the second button say "Generate".

msbrown

2009-06-16 18:54

manager   bugnote:0000048

OK, makes sense, changed as suggested.

msbrown

2009-06-17 14:02

manager   bugnote:0000054

I'm closing this one out then.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-05-18 02:51 geoffclare New Issue
2009-05-18 02:51 geoffclare Name => Geoff Clare
2009-05-18 02:51 geoffclare Organization => The Open Group
2009-06-14 16:02 msbrown Note Added: 0000045
2009-06-14 16:02 msbrown Status New => Resolution Proposed
2009-06-14 16:02 msbrown Resolution Open => Accepted As Marked
2009-06-15 02:16 geoffclare Note Added: 0000047
2009-06-16 18:54 msbrown Note Added: 0000048
2009-06-16 18:54 msbrown Status Resolution Proposed => Resolved
2009-06-17 14:02 msbrown Note Added: 0000054
2009-06-17 14:02 msbrown Status Resolved => Closed