Anonymous | Login | 2024-09-12 21:14 UTC |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Type | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
0001768 | [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2] System Interfaces | Editorial | Omission | 2023-07-18 23:56 | 2024-06-11 09:07 | ||
Reporter | larryv | View Status | public | ||||
Assigned To | |||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | Accepted As Marked | ||||
Status | Closed | ||||||
Name | Lawrence Velázquez | ||||||
Organization | |||||||
User Reference | |||||||
Section | catgets | ||||||
Page Number | 648 | ||||||
Line Number | 22290 | ||||||
Interp Status | --- | ||||||
Final Accepted Text | See Note: 0006394. | ||||||
Summary | 0001768: catgets: incomplete paragraph in "Change History" | ||||||
Description |
Under section "Change History", subsection "Issue 7", the second paragraph ends mid-sentence. In its entirety, it reads:Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, adding |
||||||
Desired Action |
At a bare minimum, on page 648, line 22290, change:Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, addingto: Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied.This is a complete sentence and paragraph, at least. Ideally, change: Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, addingto: Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 is applied, adding [whatever was added].Unfortunately, I don't know anything about this interpretation and thus cannot suggest replacement text. |
||||||
Tags | applied_after_i8d3, tc3-2008 | ||||||
Attached Files | |||||||
|
Notes | |
(0006394) geoffclare (manager) 2023-07-20 09:25 |
The text of Austin Group Interpretation 1003.1-2001 #148 can be found here: https://collaboration.opengroup.org/austin/interps/documents/14539/AI-148.txt [^] It doesn't contain any changes to catgets()! I wondered whether there might be a typo in the 148 number, but I have been unable to find any other interpretation (besides #044 that is already listed) affecting catgets(), and as far as I can see, all of the changes to catgets() between Issue 6 and Issue 7 are described in the other Change History entries. The other possibility is that this entry should have been on a different page, but all of the functions affected by #148 have a Change History entry for it. So I think all we can do at this point is treat this line as spurious and delete it. |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | New Issue | |
2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | Name | => Lawrence Velázquez |
2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | Section | => catgets |
2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | Page Number | => 648 |
2023-07-18 23:56 | larryv | Line Number | => 22290 |
2023-07-20 09:25 | geoffclare | Note Added: 0006394 | |
2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Interp Status | => --- |
2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Final Accepted Text | => See Note: 0006394. |
2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Status | New => Resolved |
2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Resolution | Open => Accepted As Marked |
2023-07-27 15:30 | Don Cragun | Tag Attached: tc3-2008 | |
2023-08-17 11:05 | geoffclare | Status | Resolved => Applied |
2023-08-17 11:06 | geoffclare | Tag Attached: applied_after_i8d3 | |
2024-06-11 09:07 | agadmin | Status | Applied => Closed |
Mantis 1.1.6[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |