Anonymous | Login | 2024-04-23 08:02 UTC |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Type | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
0001717 | [Issue 8 drafts] Shell and Utilities | Editorial | Clarification Requested | 2023-05-07 14:34 | 2023-06-29 16:28 | ||
Reporter | rillig | View Status | public | ||||
Assigned To | |||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | Rejected | ||||
Status | Closed | Product Version | Draft 3 | ||||
Name | Roland Illig | ||||||
Organization | |||||||
User Reference | |||||||
Section | make | ||||||
Page Number | 3118 | ||||||
Line Number | 105115 | ||||||
Final Accepted Text | |||||||
Summary | 0001717: Reword unclear 'shall be evaluated' | ||||||
Description |
Line 105115 says: > It shall be evaluated for both target and inference rules. The above wording leaves it unclear _why_ the macro would need to be evaluated. It would make more sense to say 'shall be evaluatable' or 'shall be available'. |
||||||
Desired Action | Reword 'evaluated' to 'evaluatable', everywhere on page 3118. | ||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
Attached Files | |||||||
|
Notes | |
(0006376) Don Cragun (manager) 2023-06-29 16:28 |
We do not see any problem with the current wording. Changing "evaluated" to "evaluatable" doesn't require the macro to be expanded. |
Mantis 1.1.6[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |