|
|
| Reporter | geoffclare | Assigned To | | |
|---|
| Priority | normal | Severity | Objection | Type | Omission |
|---|
| Status | Closed | Resolution | Accepted | |
|---|
|
|
| Name | Geoff Clare |
|---|
| Organization | The Open Group |
|---|
| User Reference | |
|---|
| Section | sh |
|---|
| Page Number | 3226 |
|---|
| Line Number | 108295 |
|---|
| Interp Status | --- |
|---|
| Final Accepted Text | |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Summary | 0001519: Mismatch between sh and set for -o and +o with no option-argument |
|---|
| Description | The sh SYNOPSIS shows -o and +o as requiring an option-argument; however the description in OPTIONS refers to set for these options, and set has SYNOPSIS lines that allow them without an option-argument.
Some shell implementations complain if you invoke them with "sh -o" or "sh +o", but others do the equivalent of "set -o" or "set +o" (and then enter interactive mode).
|
|---|
| Desired Action | Append to the second paragraph of OPTIONS (where set is referenced):If the -o or +o option is specified without an option-argument, the behavior is unspecified.
|
|---|
| Tags | tc3-2008 |
|---|
