View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0001486Issue 8 draftsFront Matterpublic2021-07-08 15:09
Reporterrhansen Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityEditorialTypeOmission
Status ClosedResolutionWithdrawn 
Product VersionDraft 2 
NameRichard Hansen
Organization
User Reference
SectionTypographical Conventions
Page Numberxii
Line Number
Final Accepted Text
Summary0001486: Are parentheticals normative or informative?
DescriptionFor years, the Austin Group has operated under the assumption that stuff in parentheses is considered informative notes, not normative. However, during the 2021-06-28 telecon we couldn't find anything in POSIX or in style guides from standards bodies that made this clear to the reader. Is this uncodified lore?

If stuff in parentheses is informative, what about stuff in em dashes (or spaced en dashes)?

If parentheticals are informative, does this conflict with style guides from standards bodies?
Desired ActionMention that parentheticals in parentheses are informative and parentheticals in dashes are normative (if the surrounding text is normative).
TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

rhansen

2021-07-08 15:09

manager   bugnote:0005391

Response from Tom Thompson at IEEE when asked whether there is an existing rule about parentheticals being informative:
I am not sure of the "rule" they refer to. IEEE SA does not consider items in parenthesis as informative.

The only items we automatically consider informative in standards are the introduction, NOTES (in tables, figures, and text) Footnotes to text....Please note Footnotes in Tables and Figures are considered Normative, and Annexes clearly marked informative. With all of that being said (text in parentheses by default is not considered informative).

I hope this helps clarify how IEEE SA sees informative versus normative references/ clauses.


During the 2021-07-01 telecon, we decided that from now on we will treat parentheticals as normative (unless inside text that is already informative). There are existing parentheticals that are intended to be normative (examples: Issue 8 draft 2 page 30 line 1039, and page 486 line 17120), so explicitly stating that parentheticals are informative would have unintended side effects. There may also be existing parentheticals that are intended to be informative and conflict with the normative text; such cases will be fixed as they are brought to the Austin Group's attention.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2021-06-28 16:43 rhansen New Issue
2021-06-28 16:43 rhansen Name => Richard Hansen
2021-06-28 16:43 rhansen Section => Typographical Conventions
2021-06-28 16:43 rhansen Page Number => xii
2021-07-08 15:09 rhansen Note Added: 0005391
2021-07-08 15:09 rhansen Status New => Closed
2021-07-08 15:09 rhansen Resolution Open => Withdrawn