View Issue Details

Jump to NotesJump to History
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0000113Aardvark BugsAardvark Mk IIIpublic2009-06-30 22:252009-10-25 22:10
ReporterDon Cragun Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityCommentTypeEnhancement Request
Status ClosedResolutionAccepted 
NameDon Cragun
OrganizationSelf
User Referencedwc-Withdrawn
Summary0000113: Shouldn't we add a Resolution choice of "Withdrawn"?
Description0000111 was withdrawn by the submitter, but has Resolution "Rejected".
Shouldn't we have a "Withdrawn" choice in the Resolution field?
Desired ActionAdd a Resolution field choice of "Withdrawn".
TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

msbrown

2009-07-02 19:19

manager   bugnote:0000150

I'm not sure that we need it; the fact that it was withdrawn can be in the notes - do we need an extra state to track?

Don Cragun

2009-07-03 06:24

manager   bugnote:0000151

Maybe we don't need the extra state, but the note saying the bug had
been withdrawn was missing from the original transcription from
xshbug3.txt and after adding the note, it appears on my screen three
pages after the fact that it was rejected.

In xshbug3.txt, the note that the issue had been withdrawn appears two
lines after the status of Rejected making it easy to see it immediately
in context.

msbrown

2009-10-25 22:10

manager   bugnote:0000264

There is now a Resolution choice of "Withdrawn".

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-06-30 22:25 Don Cragun New Issue
2009-06-30 22:25 Don Cragun Name => Don Cragun
2009-06-30 22:25 Don Cragun User Reference => dwc-Withdrawn
2009-07-01 15:15 Don Cragun Organization => Self
2009-07-02 19:19 msbrown Note Added: 0000150
2009-07-02 19:22 msbrown Status New => Under Review
2009-07-03 06:24 Don Cragun Note Added: 0000151
2009-10-25 22:10 msbrown Note Added: 0000264
2009-10-25 22:10 msbrown Status Under Review => Closed
2009-10-25 22:10 msbrown Resolution Open => Accepted